Speaker
Description
Integrated modelling for magnetically confined tokamak plasmas is an indispensable tool in interpreting and in guiding the tokamak experiments. To evolve the plasma profiles (current, densities, temperatures), integrated modelling schemes solve a system of stiff diffusion-advection transport equations, constructed using a set of physical models for equilibrium, transport and sources. It is crucial for the solver of the transport equations to be accurate, numerically stable, conservative and fast converging to ensure robustness and to reduce the number of calls to numerically expensive physical models.
In this work we adapt the conservative Interpolated Differential Operation (IDO) scheme [1] to solve the Generalized Form of Transport Equations [2] (backwards-Euler time advance)
which is used to formulate transport equations in ETS [2] for linearized iterations in the non-linear convergence loop. Here,
The proposed scheme has 4th order of convergence in space, which enables significant reduction of the spatial grid size while retaining high accuracy, thus minimizing calls to expensive physical models [3]. The proposed scheme is conservative by design, since it directly solves cell-integrated version of eq. (1). Additionally, as compared to IDO-based implementations [3], the scheme proposed here does not require the second-order derivative of diffusion and the first-order derivative of the source term, thus avoiding issues related to instabilities when taking numerical derivatives of transport coefficients computed by physical codes. The non-linear convergence using under-relaxation is similar to that reported in [3].
This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council - Vetenskapsrådet (2021-00182) and has been carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium, funded by the European Union via the Euratom Research and Training Programme (Grant Agreement No 101052200 - EUROfusion). Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Commission. Neither the European Union nor the European Commission can be held responsible for them.
References:
[1] Y. Imai, T. Aioki and K. Takizawa, Journal of Computational Physics 227, 4 (2008)
[2] D. P. Coster, et al., IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 38, 9 (2010)
[3] J. M. Park, et al., Computer Physics Communications 214, (2017)