Speakers
Description
Bayesian global analysis of measured observables is nowadays a standard method for determining the properties and initial conditions of the hot QCD-matter produced in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions. However, even with surrogate models like Gaussian process emulators (GPEs) reducing the amount of simulations, it can be computationally prohibitively expensive to produce sufficient training data for statistics-hungry rare observables. To overcome this, we introduce [1] a novel deep convolutional neural network (NN) -enhanced Bayesian global analysis of heavy-ion observables. We employ relativistic 2+1 D second-order viscous hydrodynamics with a dynamical freeze-out and initial conditions computed from the pQCD\&saturation -based event-by-event (EbyE) EKRT-model [2]. As constraints, we exploit data from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV Au+Au collisions at RHIC, and from $2.76$ and $5.02$ TeV Pb+Pb and $5.44$ TeV Xe+Xe collisions at the LHC. We replace the slow hydrodynamical simulations by the fast NNs, which predict bulk observables directly from the initial energy density profiles EbyE [3], accounting for the QCD-matter properties [4]. With the NN output, we train the GPEs for obtaining the studied centrality-class averaged observables and their uncertainties. The NNs reduce the computing time by orders of magnitude. Our analysis results in a specific shear viscosity $\eta/s$ with a minimum-value plateau at temperatures $150\lesssim T \lesssim 230$ MeV with $0.12 \lesssim (\eta/s)_{\mathrm{min}} \lesssim 0.18$, and in a non-zero bulk viscous coefficient $\zeta/s$ at $200\lesssim T \lesssim 300$ MeV. At the freeze-out, the Knudsen number is $0.8-2.3$ and the ratio of the mean-free-path to the system size $0.3-1.2$, the data thus implying that the freeze-out indeed happens at the expected applicability limit of hydrodynamics.
[1] J. Auvinen, K. J. Eskola, H. Hirvonen and H. Niemi, arXiv:2603.26413 [hep-ph].
[2] H. Hirvonen, K. J. Eskola and H. Niemi, Phys. Rev. C 106, 044913 (2022).
[3] H. Hirvonen, K. J. Eskola and H. Niemi, Phys. Rev. C 108, 034905 (2023).
[4] H. Hirvonen, K. J. Eskola and H. Niemi, EPJ Web Conf. 296, 02002 (2024).