30 June 2024 to 4 July 2024
FMDUL
Europe/Lisbon timezone

Spectrum Analysis for Identification of Nuclides at Radiological Crime Scene

3 Jul 2024, 15:07
1m
Main Auditorium (FMDUL)

Main Auditorium

FMDUL

Main Auditorium of the Faculty of Dental Medicine at the University of Lisbon (Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade de Lisboa)

Speaker

Ioannis Kaissas (. School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Description

With the increasing global emphasis on nuclear security and non-proliferation, the detection and identification of nuclear and radioactive materials at the radiological crime scene are of paramount importance. To address this need, in the past free software has been developed identifying the photopeaks of the spectrum [1], [2], [3], [4] and commercial detectors identify the nuclides [5] presented on the area under investigation. In the present work an algorithm has been developed to analyze γ-ray spectrums collected by specialized detectors, such as portable High Purity Germanium (HPGe) detectors and to attempt beyond the peak identification, identifying the nuclides that emit the photopeaks.
Initially the algorithm reads a spectrum file and extracts relevant information such as live time and photon counts for each energy channel. After that it performs a baseline correction on the spectrum, followed by peak detection. Peaks are identified with the local maximum method exploiting the 1st or 2nd order derivative [6] or with a minimum peak prominence criterion or with a minimum peak height criterion. The minimum peak height criterion identifies the local maxima in the spectrum that surpasses a specified minimum height and sorts the peaks by height. The minimum peak prominence criterion identifies the local maxima and returns only those peaks that have a relative importance bigger than a specified minimum prominence. The minimum peak prominence criterion performs better than the minimum peak height criterion.
A conventional energy calibration is performed on the spectrum data to convert channels to energy values, based on radioactive sources which emit γ-rays of known energy. Additional calibration is performed to adjust the height of the photopeaks, considering the efficiency curve of the detector.
The algorithm identifies possible nuclides associated with each peak by searching for nuclides within a specified range of energy interval, minimum half-life, and minimum fraction yield of the photopeak (i.e. intensity). The matching process involves comparing photopeaks of the spectrum under investigation with a complete dataset of energies of γ-rays and their emitters.
To exclude false positive identifications of nuclides, the first criterion considers a certain number (e.g. the first six) of the most intense γ-ray energies that each possible nuclide emits and investigates whether these energies are correlated with the photopeaks. In addition, a second criterion checks the height of the photopeaks based on their yield by their emitters. For example, if a nuclide identified on the spectrum by two photopeaks emits them with intensity 70% and 30%, respectively, but the first is shorter than the second one then the nuclide is labeled as false positive. The comparison of using both criteria than just the first one turns in favor of using both criteria, thus the number of false positive identifications decreases.

References
[1] C.A. Kalfas, M. Axiotis, C. Tsabaris, SPECTRW: A software package for nuclear and atomic spectroscopy, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Volume 830, 2016, Pages 265-274, ISSN 0168-9002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.05.098.
[2] Davood Alizadeh, Saleh Ashrafi, New hybrid metaheuristic algorithm for scintillator gamma ray spectrum analysis, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Volume 915, 2019, Pages 1-9, ISSN 0168-9002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2018.10.178.
[3] Matjaž Korun, Branko Vodenik, Benjamin Zorko, Calculation of the decision thresholds for radionuclides identified in gamma-ray spectra by post-processing peak analysis results, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, Volume 813, 2016, Pages 102-110, ISSN 0168-9002, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.01.020.
[4] Lahcen El Amri, Abdelouahed Chetaine, Hamid Amsil, Brahim El Mokhtari, Hamid Bounouira, Abdessamad Didi, Abdelfettah Benchrif, Khalid Laraki, Hamid Marah, New open-source software for gamma-ray spectra analysis, Applied Radiation and Isotopes, Volume 185, 2022, 110227, ISSN 0969-8043, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110227.
[5] National Urban Security and Technology Laboratory, 2015. Handheld Radionuclide Identification Devices (RIDs) Market Survey Report. U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate.
[6] https://www.originlab.com/doc/Origin-Help/PA-Algorithm

Authors

A. Kyriakis (Institute of Nuclear and Particle Physics, National Center for Scientific Research "Demokritos", 15341 Agia Paraskevi Attikis, Greece) I. Themistokleous (School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece) Ioannis Kaissas (. School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece) K. Karafasoulis (Division of Natural Sciences and Applications, Hellenic Army Academy, 16673 Vari Attikis, Greece) S. Xanthos (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, International Hellenic University, 57400 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Presentation materials