e-mail from Luca Valenziano concerning the action on him "how to establish a link between EU-T0 and the Euclid SGS":
As you probably know, the Euclid SGS successfully passed the Design Review. Euclid computing model is fully consolidated, as it is also reported in APPEC computing roadmap (http://www.appec.org/roadmap/computing - please note that Euclid data rate is 230 Gbit/day). There is no major concern on input data volume and raw data processing. At present, the major challenge the SGS is facing is including all calibration data needed. As confirmed by the positive review output, there is confidence that the actual development activity will be able to fulfill all pipeline requirements.
Being well aware of the complexity of exploiting results of such a mission, I discussed with Andrea where EU-T0 could have a positive impact on Euclid. Results from Euclid data processing, ‘products’ as to say, will be verified against quality requirements, as foreseen in the SGS plan. Resources are already planned for that. Yet, as it is the case for Planck data analysis, additional validation activity could significantly improve the final science assessment. Large simulations and huge computing resources (simply scaling Euclid from Planck) are needed for that. This is an area where EU-T0 could act to support the Euclid Consortium. Since this is outside the actual SGS perimeter, the Euclid Consortium Lead, Yannick Mellier, should be contacted on this topic. I think it could be the right time, in the project development, to address that.
So, I am proposing to the EU-T0 board to take an action to invite the EC lead to discuss possible synergy on extended data validation, beyond SGS activities.