Speaker
Description
Details of the explosion mechanism of core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) are not yet fully understood. There is now an increasing number of successful examples of reproducing explosions in the first-principles simulations, which have shown a slow increase of explosion energy. However, it was recently pointed out that the growth rates of the explosion energy of these simulations are insufficient to produce enough $^{56}$Ni mass to account for observations. We refer to this issue as the "nickel mass problem" (Ni problem, hereafter; Sawada et al. 2019, Suwa et al. 2019, Sawada & Suwa 2021).
Also similar to this issue, the apparent 56Ni problem in Ultrastripped supernovae (USSNe) with a relatively low ejecta mass of $\sim0.1M_\odot$ (e.g., iPTF 14gqr and SN 2019dge) has been recently reported (Sawada et al. 2022).
From these perspectives, radioisotope $^{56}$Ni is an important indicator of the supernova explosions, which characterizes light curves. Nevertheless, rather than 56Ni, explosion energy has often been paid attention from the explosion mechanism community, since it is, at a glance, easier to estimate from numerical data than the amount of $^{56}$Ni. In this talk, I will discuss the relationship between the radioisotope $^{56}$Ni and the explosion mechanism of supernovae, and "Ni problem", focusing on my own study.
Length of presentation requested | Oral presentation: 17 min + 3 min questions |
---|---|
Please select between one and three keywords related to your abstract | Stellar explosions and mergers - theory |
2nd keyword (optional) | Astronomy |
3rd keyword (optional) | Stellar explosions and mergers - observations |