Speaker
Description
One of the great advantages of High Temperature Superconductor (HTS) magnets is their high thermal stability. Yet many protection concepts envisioned for large magnets deliberately work against this property by improving normal-zone propagation through partial insulation, heaters, or other means. Better propagation may help distribute energy, but it also makes the coil itself less stable.
There is a second problem: when the protection function is built into the winding pack, it is difficult to validate it independently. Testing this type of protection means deliberately driving the magnet into precisely the condition it is meant to survive, putting the full coil at risk.
This talk argues for separating these two functions. The magnet should be optimised for stability, cooling, and recovery from disturbances, while fast and deliberately unstable behaviour is moved into a dedicated, independently testable protection component. The challenge then becomes a rather unusual one: can we build an HTS component that is very good at becoming resistive, quickly and reliably, when we ask it to?
| Submitters Country | Netherlands |
|---|---|
| Are you a student? | No |
| Author Affiliations & Email Addresses | I confirm that valid email addresses and affiliations have been added for all co-authors. |
| Co-Author Affirmation | By clicking here, I, the submitting author, affirm that all co-authors know of and concur with the submission of this abstract. |