Welcome and Motivation Motivation & mini-logic for scheduling The Organizers

SM CMS

• Freya Blekman (IIHE, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE))

Discussion

SM ATLAS

• Sergei Chekanov (Argonne National Laboratory (US))

Discussion

Higgs - ATLAS

• Thibault Guillemin (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR))

Discussion

Higgs - CMS

• Francesco Costanza (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DE))

Discussion

SM + Higgs theory

• Kirill Melnikov (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany)

Discussion

Higgs BSM Theory overview - agnostic about models

• Ian Low (Argonne National Lab/Northwestern Univ)

Discussion

SM and Higgs and what you can do with it

• Michelangelo Mangano (CERN)

Discussion

Naturalness, Higgs, LHC upgrade and the future

• Nima Arkani-Hamed (IAS)

CMS SUSY

• Markus Stoye (CERN)

Discussion

ATLAS SUSY

• Michele Weber (Universitaet Bern (CH))

Discussion

SUSY Theory Status and Recent Ideas

• Nathaniel Craig (UC Santa Barbara)

Discussion

ATLAS Exotics

• Henri Bachacou (CEA/IRFU,Centre d'etude de Saclay Gif-sur-Yvette (FR))

Discussion

CMS Exotics

• Greg Landsberg (Brown University (US))

Discussion

Panel - MC and analytic calculations agreement with data

• Bryan Webber (University of Cambridge (GB))
• Kentarou Mawatari (LPSC Grenoble)
• Stefano Forte (Università degli Studi e INFN Milano (IT))
• Stephen Mrenna (FERMILAB)
• Gavin Salam (CERN)
• Massimiliano Grazzini (Universitaet Zuerich (CH))
• Frank Martin Krauss (University of Durham (GB))
• Christian Bauer

Naturalness and Neutral Naturalness Theory Motivation

• Riccardo Rattazzi (Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (CH))

Burning Questions

Dark Matter Theory Motivation and Status Report

• Matthew Reece (Harvard University)

Burning Questions

Panel - Other theory motivations? - Where would you put your money for the LHC and why?

• John Terning (UC Davis)
• Zackaria Chacko
• Michael Peskin (SLAC)
• Scott David Thomas (Rutgers, State Univ. of New Jersey (US))
• Riccardo Rattazzi (Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (CH))
• David Shih (Rutgers University)

Walk to Banquet at Exeter College

The case and plan for 3/ab

• Chris Hill (Ohio State University (US))

How best to use LHC results as virtual probes of new physics above the scale of the LHC (25+5 minutes for questions)

• R. Contino (CERN)

Finding new physics hidden in the bulk of SM distrbutions (25+5 minutes for questions)

• Matthew Strassler (Rutgers University)

New physics hidden by exotic or long lived signatures (25+5 minutes for questions)

• David Curtin (University of Maryland)

LHCb - experimental - Impact for new physics via flavor and beyond (25+5 minutes for questions)

• Mitesh Patel (Imperial College (GB))

LHCb - theory - Impact for new physics via flavor and beyond (25+5 minutes for questions)

• Gilad Perez (Weizmann Institute)

Panel - What do we learn with less than 3/ab, e.g. current dataset, 300/fb 1/ab for vanilla studies or truly exotic ones? Is 3/ab really needed? Near future of CERN?

• Iacopo Vivarelli (University of Sussex (GB))
• Tobias Golling (Universite de Geneve (CH))
• Scott David Thomas (Rutgers, State Univ. of New Jersey (US))
• Michelangelo Mangano (CERN)
• James Olsen (Princeton University)

Panel - Dark Matter and neutral long lived particles: what can it motivate further for LHC?

• Steven Worm (STFC - Rutherford Appleton Lab. (GB))
• Koji Terashi (University of Tokyo (JP))
• Yanou Cui (Perimeter Institute)
• Matthew Philip Mccullough (CERN)
• Matthew Reece (Harvard University)

Panel - Without hints in the LHC data what's the next benchmark for collider physics? What are the alternative promising probes of particle physics? How best can future colliders be motivated?

• Tao Han (University of Pittsburgh)
• Matthew Reece (Harvard University)
• Tiziano Camporesi (CERN)
• Andreas Hoecker (CERN)
• Raman Sundrum (University of Maryland)
• Nathaniel Craig (UC Santa Barbara)
• Michael Peskin (SLAC)

END