WEBVTT 1 00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.200 Stefania Juks: I'm just checking from Katina. Boys. 2 00:00:18.060 --> 00:00:19.520 Stefania Juks: Katarina, can you hear us. 3 00:00:19.940 --> 00:00:20.675 Caterina Bloise: Yes. 4 00:00:22.210 --> 00:00:35.497 Caterina Bloise: I present the European Ldg working group on Sustainability assessment of future accelerator. Thanks for this opportunity to present this activity. 5 00:00:42.580 --> 00:01:02.629 Caterina Bloise: The Ledg group is the panel of directors of the Major particle Physics Laboratory in Europe. It has the mandate by the Senate Council to define 6 00:01:02.630 --> 00:01:14.260 Caterina Bloise: and coordinated activity on the research and development roadmap for future larger facility in the field 7 00:01:14.260 --> 00:01:20.630 Caterina Bloise: of accelerator science for future large scale, facility for particle physics. 8 00:01:20.670 --> 00:01:33.870 Caterina Bloise: There are 5 spec panels devoted to the major sector of the development of accelerator physics 9 00:01:33.970 --> 00:01:46.170 Caterina Bloise: on I field magnets on plasma and laser, accelerator on radio frequency structure, muon beams and energy recovery. Linux working from 10 00:01:46.450 --> 00:02:14.259 Caterina Bloise: the several years from in 2,024, the Ledg established a working group on sustainability with the mandate to develop guidelines and minimum set of key indicator for the sustainability assessment of future accelerator. 11 00:02:14.380 --> 00:02:30.339 Caterina Bloise: And the panel consists of 15 members with technical expertise in evaluation of accelerator sustainability working on the laboratory panels, European laboratory panels working on 12 00:02:30.340 --> 00:02:46.900 Caterina Bloise: the European horizon programs on sustainability in the accelerator field. And there are also the representative of future Collider project. 13 00:02:46.990 --> 00:02:48.360 Caterina Bloise: the 14 00:02:49.950 --> 00:03:05.330 Caterina Bloise: from May to November 2,024. We had several meetings sharing broad range of topics from the reports 15 00:03:05.330 --> 00:03:20.810 Caterina Bloise: of the major laboratories in Europe concerning the evaluation carried out for the future X factories. Fsec, Lc. Ccube and Cpc. 16 00:03:21.605 --> 00:03:44.050 Caterina Bloise: Then there was a discussion on the Key life Cycle assessment issues, and then they were invited as per contribution from concerning the carbonization for larger research infrastructure concerning the Alicia of engineering civil works for the Fcc. 17 00:03:44.130 --> 00:04:08.239 Caterina Bloise: And the European Horizon Project research, Facility, 2.0 devoted aiming to energy saving in the accelerator based infrastructure and on contribution on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in particle detectors. 18 00:04:09.198 --> 00:04:13.669 Caterina Bloise: By Patricia Mandeli, of Cern, from Cerna. 19 00:04:15.142 --> 00:04:28.950 Caterina Bloise: From these reports and follow up discussion, we derive the structure of content of a report. 20 00:04:28.950 --> 00:04:51.700 Caterina Bloise: A version of this report. A short summary of this report has been submitted as input to the European Strategy process, and has been indicated yesterday by Dave Newbold in during the panel discussion. 21 00:04:52.401 --> 00:05:09.719 Caterina Bloise: What I I will point out, the sustainability assessment is a com is complex and is a field larger under development. So we you don't have to expect an homogenic evaluation of all the issues that 22 00:05:09.740 --> 00:05:34.360 Caterina Bloise: are discussed, and for having a more advanced evaluation of all this, I think that the laboratories in Europe have to put in place a strategy that to be to be pushed over time. 23 00:05:35.610 --> 00:06:05.390 Caterina Bloise: The report is in practice provides a reference framework to enable coherent flux of information among scientists, and is focused on future collider project. But much of the work is relevant for current and future research. Infrastructure is a summary is in practice a summary of current best practices of obligation and standard that we have in this field. 24 00:06:05.700 --> 00:06:32.459 Caterina Bloise: As I say the sustainability assessment is complex, and I think that the criteria has to be tuned to the maturity of the project and separately developed for scientists, Policymakers and Society. There is a lot of work that is discussed in the report coming from economists and environmental scientists that 25 00:06:32.490 --> 00:06:44.600 Caterina Bloise: has been used in setting guidelines standard and legislation on this respect. Oh, sorry 26 00:06:45.860 --> 00:06:49.590 Caterina Bloise: in this respect. The S. 3 27 00:06:50.687 --> 00:07:08.882 Caterina Bloise: roadmap for 2,026 is focused on this on this subject. And is is, and and for the 1st time, okay, but also outline that. 28 00:07:14.460 --> 00:07:16.426 Caterina Bloise: that that 29 00:07:17.660 --> 00:07:38.870 Caterina Bloise: the focus is on the financial sustainability of the research infrastructure, but is being introducing the new while introducing the new dimension of environmental consideration to foster environmental sustainability. So we have to move in, I think, in this framework. 30 00:07:41.600 --> 00:07:55.970 Caterina Bloise: part the 1st part of the report discussed the about the comprehensive sustainability assessment based on quantitative cost, benefit analysis. 31 00:07:56.130 --> 00:08:13.090 Caterina Bloise: This is an obligation from the from several of the legislation on national and of European and national legislation. 32 00:08:13.090 --> 00:08:37.949 Caterina Bloise: We are aware that the benefits and positive personalities of the research infrastructure not fully captured by this analysis. And in fact, also, Esfrey is aware of the situation because he says that the rac should develop internal expertise for impact assessment 33 00:08:37.950 --> 00:08:44.129 Caterina Bloise: and must define a relevant impact dimension in a proactive way. 34 00:08:45.555 --> 00:08:54.879 Caterina Bloise: The an important an important subject of the report is the life 35 00:08:54.880 --> 00:09:17.810 Caterina Bloise: assessment. That is the approach to quantify the environmental impact. And is the field where the accelerator scientists can have the major impact because of the expertise of the laboratories that build and operated the accelerator 36 00:09:17.850 --> 00:09:29.610 Caterina Bloise: in in the design. In the planning costing of the the various element of the project. 37 00:09:29.720 --> 00:09:39.190 Caterina Bloise: the LSI is intending to identify the most critical element in the design, and to compare its use. 38 00:09:39.390 --> 00:09:51.219 Caterina Bloise: is intending to be used to compare the design variance and to provide also evaluation of the impact to fulfill the legal requirements 39 00:09:51.430 --> 00:10:16.020 Caterina Bloise: performing LSI for major components at each stage of the design is recommended in the report, and the coordinated efforts of the energy physics. European lab to create a common database of Lsci results is intended to be strategic, to obtain a reference framework for the project accountability. 40 00:10:18.170 --> 00:10:42.310 Caterina Bloise: The goals and scope of the lifecycle assessment also depend on target audience and are intended to optimize the facility when addressed to scientists to provide information to decision process when addressed to policymakers and to communicate global performance when addressed to society. 41 00:10:42.560 --> 00:11:07.169 Caterina Bloise: There are several detailed recommendation concerning the conduction and of the Lsci in in the report simplified, simplified Lsci at an early concept phase. 42 00:11:07.170 --> 00:11:30.709 Caterina Bloise: is recommended to set up the basis for lifecycle assessment at the later design stages, and also to mention few. The lifetime of the accelerator component that 43 00:11:30.710 --> 00:11:46.980 Caterina Bloise: are known to the scientists should be considered to to include the replacement of the system. Sensor system in the full environmental impact. 44 00:11:48.090 --> 00:12:03.769 Caterina Bloise: Another part of the of the report is devoted to the environmental impact, to comment and to to describe the environmental impact of a large research infrastructure. 45 00:12:03.770 --> 00:12:26.660 Caterina Bloise: It included the civil engineering works, the accelerator of construction, the accelerator operation with the particle detector and data acquisition center and the commissioning. We present also a table that has been shown before by Ben 46 00:12:26.660 --> 00:12:35.169 Caterina Bloise: with the synthesis of data on greenhouse gas. Emission of future colliders. 47 00:12:36.550 --> 00:13:02.050 Caterina Bloise: Last chapter is devoted to mitigation compensation measures and include the design of the research infrastructure with sustainability as a goal, the implementation of responsible procurement processes, the investment in research and development on green technology. 48 00:13:02.050 --> 00:13:12.020 Caterina Bloise: the recovery supply and natural-based intervention for carbon removal. There are also some annexes to the test. 49 00:13:12.020 --> 00:13:39.799 Caterina Bloise: With the outcome from this no mass process. Mp. 5. Report on the plans to reduce accelerator energy consumption in China, and the comprehensive sustainability assessment based on cost, benefit analysis on national legislation. Then there are key parameters and estimated greenhouse gas emissions of future colliders 50 00:13:40.760 --> 00:14:05.920 Caterina Bloise: to summarize the major recommendation in the report are to perform a comprehensive cost benefit analysis that becomes more and more important for policymaker. Having in mind that benefit and positive externalities are not fully captured, and we have to continue to develop on this field. 51 00:14:05.940 --> 00:14:30.800 Caterina Bloise: We recommend to perform a lifecycle assessment at each project stage proposal Cdr Tdr. To understand the most critical elements in the design and to provide input for technological choices reducing the environmental impact. And we recommend the coordinated efforts to develop a common database for access 52 00:14:30.800 --> 00:14:48.190 Caterina Bloise: materials and components that are strategic. To establish a framework of project accountability, we recommend adoption of responsible procurement procedures. That is one key component of sustainable research infrastructure. 53 00:14:48.810 --> 00:15:07.420 Caterina Bloise: balancing initial cost with total life cycle costs, environmental impact and social responsibility. We recommend implementation of energy management plans and investment in research and development for sustainable accelerator technologies. 54 00:15:13.530 --> 00:15:26.670 Caterina Bloise: the funding to summarize the funding landscape is changing rapidly in Europe, and beyond which we require addressing sustainability, environmental impact of future larger scale research, infrastructure. 55 00:15:26.670 --> 00:15:51.060 Caterina Bloise: sustainability, assessment for future larger scale. Accelerator infrastructure is quite complex because the assessment criteria needs to be properly tuned to the maturity of the project and different developers for scientists, police maker and society. The Ledg sustainability, working group report comprises socioeconomic benefits, accelerator basis, research, infrastructure, the basis for 56 00:15:51.230 --> 00:16:15.579 Caterina Bloise: of sustainability, assessment, the methodology, reporting of lifecycle assessment for future energy physics, accelerator, the evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions in Construction operation, the Commissioning and Mitigation Compensation Strategy. A Version a short version of the report has been submitted as input to the European strategy process. 57 00:16:15.580 --> 00:16:24.009 Caterina Bloise: and to conclude an homogenic evaluation of all issues, the Service Strategy to be postured over time. Thank you. 58 00:16:26.380 --> 00:16:27.849 Stefania Juks: Thank you so much, Katharina. 59 00:16:29.270 --> 00:16:31.759 Stefania Juks: Any questions for Katerina. 60 00:16:32.270 --> 00:16:33.110 Stefania Juks: Julian. 61 00:16:34.650 --> 00:16:38.930 Julien Faivre: Yes. Hi, can you go back to slide number 5, please. 62 00:16:38.930 --> 00:16:43.750 Caterina Bloise: Sorry, but I have problem with 5. 63 00:16:44.500 --> 00:16:45.390 Julien Faivre: Yes. 64 00:16:48.450 --> 00:16:49.640 Caterina Bloise: Okay. 5. 65 00:16:50.000 --> 00:16:54.960 Julien Faivre: Yes, exactly. So I was wondering. I mean. 66 00:16:54.960 --> 00:16:58.320 Caterina Bloise: You may you speak loudly. 67 00:16:58.600 --> 00:17:00.599 Julien Faivre: Oh, sorry! Can you hear me better like this. 68 00:17:00.600 --> 00:17:01.410 Caterina Bloise: Yes. 69 00:17:01.480 --> 00:17:16.039 Julien Faivre: Okay. I was wondering where the timetable sorry the the the table of content comes from. Maybe you said it, but I missed. It is this from the the working group report on sustainability. 70 00:17:16.220 --> 00:17:20.720 Caterina Bloise: Yes, is the is the content of the working group. Report. 71 00:17:20.940 --> 00:17:21.700 Julien Faivre: Okay, and that. 72 00:17:21.700 --> 00:17:25.099 Caterina Bloise: It will be available in June to. 73 00:17:25.630 --> 00:17:30.010 Julien Faivre: Okay? So it has not been added to the Esp 74 00:17:30.270 --> 00:17:33.990 Julien Faivre: contribution. Right? It is not in the supplemental material. 75 00:17:34.250 --> 00:17:39.359 Caterina Bloise: We'll be there. Okay, we'll be releasing June. So we. 76 00:17:39.360 --> 00:17:42.540 Julien Faivre: Okay. Okay. Good. Okay. Thank you very much. 77 00:17:47.360 --> 00:17:48.730 Stefania Juks: Thank you so much again. 78 00:17:50.860 --> 00:17:56.699 Stefania Juks: since I'm seeing no other hands. And we're a bit over time, maybe we can move.